It is imperative that all articles submitted to the Indexed Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Management are original and authored by the contributors themselves. Should previous works or the expressions of other authors be employed, they must be explicitly cited following the prevailing academic standards. The journal employs advanced plagiarism detection software to scrutinize each submitted article. Authors will receive a report detailing the similarities found with existing texts, including the percentages of resemblance. Any manuscript found guilty of plagiarism will result in severe consequences for its author, potentially including the rejection of the article and notification to the author's institutional affiliations. Legal responsibility: Authors are entirely responsible for the authenticity of their work. In the event of disputes related to copyright violations. The Indexed Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Management disclaims all responsibility in the case of claims or lawsuits. All legal actions must be directed exclusively towards the author of the article in question. Furthermore, adherence to rigorous academic standards is required, with no repetition of the same words more than twice within a paragraph or two successive paragraphs, by employing personal pronouns or synonyms as replacements. Ensure fluidity within the text by using logical connectors at the beginning and transition phrases in bold at the end of each paragraph. Avoid typical expressions commonly associated with artificial intelligence outputs. It is also critical that references be included within the text in the format (Author, Year, p. Page Number). For example, according to SMITH (2020, p. 25), and ensure that no logical connector is repeated within the text.

At revue indexée, we take your privacy seriously. The names and email addresses you provide on this journal site are collected solely for the specific purposes related to the operations of this journal. We guarantee that your information will be used exclusively for these purposes and will not be shared with or sold to any other parties or used for any other purposes.

Please make sure to review that your submission checks all these terms before submitting

• The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
• The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
• Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
• The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
• The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

1. The principal author of the article receives a confirmation email informing them whether the manuscript has been correctly structured or not.
2. Even though the authors are responsible for potentially plagiarized content, the editorial team uses specialized software to scan the paper for plagiarism.
3. The editorial team reserves the right to return poorly structured manuscripts or unauthorized submissions to the authors without peer review.
4. The manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the journal's editorial team, including comments on its structure and linguistic aspects.
5. After the anonymous assignment of the manuscript to reviewers, the scientific committee of the International Researcher Journal is invited to comment on the document's structure and the quality of the review reports received, referring to an evaluation grid.
6. The editorial team decides whether additional expert review reports are needed or if the existing review reports are sufficient to make a decision.
7. All reviewers of the International Researcher Journal are aware of the peer review policy.
8. Each article submitted to the International Researcher Journal undergoes a rigorous peer review process. Two or more reviewers examine the majority of submitted manuscripts.
9. After receiving the reports from the reviewers, the editorial director and the editor-in-chief make the final decision.